Tesamorelin Research
An evidence-led review of tesamorelin research: what its approval covers and what it does not, and what the human trials actually found.
CJC-1295 with DAC is a long-acting analogue of growth hormone releasing factor, supplied as a research chemical and not for human consumption. It holds no marketing authorization anywhere, and no application has ever been filed, so it has never been refused approval [9a].
The backbone is human GRF(1-29) with four substitutions, at positions 2, 8, 15 and 27 [1]. An added lysine carries an N-epsilon-3-maleimidopropionamide group, the drug affinity complex or DAC, which reacts with the free thiol of cysteine-34 on albumin [1]. This is a growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor agonist, not a growth hormone analogue.
CAS 446262-90-4 resolves to PubChem CID 91971820, C165H269N47O46, molecular weight 3647.2, the DAC-bearing molecule [2]. The widely circulated 863288-34-0 resolves instead to CID 56841945 at 3367.9, the DAC-free peptide sold as modified GRF(1-29) [2]. Every figure below belongs to the DAC form alone, and the DAC-free peptide is essentially uncharacterized in humans [17]. Material labeled CJC-1295 with DAC and material labeled without DAC are two different molecules.
Three published studies have given the compound to humans, 63 healthy volunteers, 73 percent receiving a single administration [9a]. The third analyzed a subset of the second cohort, not an independent third group [5][9a]. None had a disease or condition, and no study ever has [9a].
The estimated half-life was 5.8 to 8.1 days, and single administration raised mean plasma growth hormone 2- to 10-fold for 6 days or more [3]. Mean IGF-1 rose 1.5- to 3-fold for 9 to 11 days, staying above baseline for up to 28 days after repeated administration [3]. No serious adverse reactions were reported [3]. Injection-site reactions affected roughly 70 percent of recipients, and systemic vasodilatory reactions with transient hypotension 30 percent, against none on placebo [3][9a].
A second study found pulsatility preserved, pulse frequency and magnitude unaltered, while trough growth hormone rose 7.5-fold [4]. IGF-1 rose 45 percent and correlated with no measured parameter of growth hormone secretion, though the authors concluded the trough rise drove it [4]. A third report analyzed serum proteins in 11 men from that same cohort [5]. Nothing downstream of this pharmacology has been demonstrated in a human.
NCT00267527, the only interventional trial for this compound on the US and EU registers, was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study in adults with HIV-associated visceral obesity [7][12]. It is recorded as TERMINATED [7]. The European register holds the same study as EudraCT 2005-003797-25, ended "Prematurely" [8]. Neither says why: the ClinicalTrials.gov record has no why-stopped field and no posted results [7]. Its enrollment figure of 120 was a target never revised [7]. The number enrolled at the halt was 192, which does not come from the registry [9a][11].
The sponsor stopped the study on 17 July 2006 after a participant at an Argentine site died [11]. The fullest account reaches the public record through two December 2024 docket documents, an FDA briefing document and a submission by compounding interests [9a][9b]. Both report chest discomfort two hours after an eleventh weekly injection, an ECG confirming acute myocardial infarction, and death approximately one hour later [9a][9b]. Each carries the attending physician's conclusion in that same paragraph, that his most likely explanation was asymptomatic coronary artery disease with plaque rupture and occlusion [9a][9b].
Both halves come from the same anecdotal chain: the briefing document's footnote to that paragraph reads "See the following two internet anecdotal reports" [9a]. The contemporaneous trade-press item carries the timing only as an unconfirmed anecdotal report, with no ECG and no physician conclusion [11]. Timing and attribution therefore stand or fall together, and neither can be reported as fact while the other is reported as opinion.
The docket submission elsewhere miscalls CJC-1295 a synthetic analogue of growth hormone, which is wrong [9b]. The briefing document reports FAERS and CAERS searched through 2024, with no case reports for CJC-1295 [9a]. No peer-reviewed account of this trial or this death exists, causality was never adjudicated, and no sponsor has registered a trial since [9a][12].
Repeat-dose studies in rats and dogs reported injection-site hemorrhage, inflammation and necrosis alongside reduced red cell measures [9a]. In GHRH-knockout mice the compound produced somatotroph proliferation, and no two-year carcinogenicity study of any form of CJC-1295 exists [6][9a]. These are animal findings, and none has been shown in a human.
On 4 December 2024 an FDA advisory committee voted 0 to 13 against the DAC forms on the 503A bulks list [10]. That vote concerns pharmacy compounding eligibility and is advisory, not a safety adjudication [10].
Tesamorelin is a GHRH(1-44) analogue acting at the same pituitary receptor [13][16]. Its FDA approval, granted on 10 November 2010, still stands for reduction of excess abdominal fat in HIV-infected adult patients with lipodystrophy [13]. Its label limits that further: long-term cardiovascular safety is not established, and it is not indicated for weight loss because its effect is weight neutral [14]. It never obtained a European authorization: the applicant, Ferrer Internacional, S.A., withdrew the application under CHMP review, and no refusal decision was issued [15].
The shared receptor is where the resemblance ends. Tesamorelin's mean elimination half-life is formulation-specific, 8 minutes and 11 minutes, and it is administered once daily in its label [14][16]. CJC-1295 with DAC has an estimated half-life of 5.8 to 8.1 days, with trough growth hormone raised 7.5-fold [3][4]. Same receptor, exposures orders of magnitude apart in duration. GHRH analogue names a receptor target, not a duration of action.
The approval belongs to the molecule tesamorelin and to one indication. It is not a family credential and must never be written as one. The honest contrast is not that tesamorelin works and the others might too. It is that tesamorelin is the only one of the nine that has been through the process that would let anyone know.
GHRP-2 is reported to be used in Japan as a diagnostic agent for growth hormone deficiency testing, unverified against any primary regulator [18]. The cited source records only that Japanese approval was pending in 2004 [18]. A diagnostic provocative test is not a therapeutic authorization, and is not comparable to tesamorelin's.
Which CAS number identifies the DAC form? CAS 446262-90-4 resolves to PubChem CID 91971820 at molecular weight 3647.2, the DAC-bearing molecule [2]. The widely circulated 863288-34-0 resolves to CID 56841945 at 3367.9, a different molecule, and the pharmacokinetic data apply only to the DAC form [2][3].
What is known about the death in the terminated trial? Two December 2024 docket documents report chest discomfort two hours after an eleventh weekly injection, an ECG-confirmed infarction, and death about an hour later [9a][9b]. Both documents carry the attending physician's attribution in that same paragraph, to asymptomatic coronary artery disease with plaque rupture [9a][9b]. Both halves rest on that one anecdotal chain, and neither registry records a reason for stopping [7][8][9a].
CJC-1295 With DAC is available as a research compound, HPLC-verified with a batch-specific COA.
Certificate of Analysis
Batch PP/CJCD/062026 · 99.431% purity by HPLC · certified Aug 2026
References
An evidence-led review of tesamorelin research: what its approval covers and what it does not, and what the human trials actually found.
An evidence-led review of MGF research: what the splice variant is, its contested receptor and laboratory record, and the state of the human evidence.
An evidence-led review of IGF-1 LR3 research: weaker binding at the same receptor, what has been measured, and why the half-life claim runs backwards.
An evidence-led review of IGF-1 DES research: the same receptor as IGF-1 but different binding-protein behaviour, what has been measured, and in what.
An evidence-led review of HGH Fragment 176-191 research: which molecule the work was actually done on, the animal findings, and the human evidence.
An evidence-led review of Hexarelin research: two receptors rather than one, desensitization on repeated dosing, and the human and rat cardiac findings.