VIP Research
An evidence-led review of VIP and aviptadil research: regulatory status stated precisely, the COVID-19 and ARDS trials, and the erectile dysfunction evidence.
Kisspeptin-10 is a synthetic decapeptide used in research on reproductive hormone control. [1] It is the shortest fragment of the human KISS1 gene product that retains full activity at the kisspeptin receptor. [1] Human kisspeptin-10 research consists almost entirely of small physiological studies measuring luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone and other reproductive steroids. [3][10][14] A much larger literature uses kisspeptin-54, a different molecule, and the two must be kept apart. [4][5][6]
Kisspeptin-10 corresponds to residues 112 to 121 of the KISS1 precursor, also written as metastin 45-54, and its sequence is Tyr-Asn-Trp-Asn-Ser-Phe-Gly-Leu-Arg-Phe with a C-terminal amide. [1] PubChem records the free base as C63H83N17O14, molecular weight 1302.4, CAS 374675-21-5. [1] Research-grade Kisspeptin-10 is usually supplied as an acetate or trifluoroacetate salt, which does not conflict with that CAS. [1]
Kisspeptin-54 shares the same C-terminal ten residues but is a 54-residue peptide of far greater mass. [7] Almost every headline human kisspeptin study used kisspeptin-54, including the brain-imaging and sexual-desire trials, so those results are not kisspeptin-10 data. [4][5][6] Kisspeptin-13 and kisspeptin-14 extend the same C-terminus, so residue count needs checking before a paper counts as kisspeptin-10 evidence. [26] Much preclinical work uses the rodent kisspeptin-10 sequence, which ends in tyrosine where the human decapeptide ends in phenylalanine. [26]
Kisspeptin-10 is an agonist at the kisspeptin receptor, also called KISS1R or GPR54. [7] In healthy men, a single intravenous bolus produced an immediate LH pulse and delayed the next endogenous pulse. [2] That points to an action upstream at the GnRH pulse generator rather than at the pituitary. [2] In juvenile rhesus monkeys under continuous exposure, a further kisspeptin bolus no longer evoked LH. [8] GnRH and NMDA boluses still did, placing the desensitization at the receptor with the downstream machinery intact. [8] In adult monkeys the same kind of infusion truncated the bolus response at the lower dose and abolished it at the higher one. [23] There the pituitary response to a GnRH bolus was itself compromised, so the downstream machinery was not intact in adults. [23]
In mice, systemically injected kisspeptin-54, but not kisspeptin-10, activated c-FOS in GnRH neurons behind the blood-brain barrier. [7] Repeated kisspeptin-10 injections given to offset its shorter half-life did not reproduce the sustained LH rise seen after kisspeptin-54, so clearance alone does not explain the gap. [7] The authors attribute it to barrier penetration and pharmacokinetics together. [7] Those half-lives, roughly 32 minutes for kisspeptin-54 and roughly 4 minutes for kisspeptin-10, were measured in mice, not in people. [7] The same authors caution that they gave human peptides to mice, and do not know whether murine kisspeptins behave differently. [7] Human plasma half-life has been reported separately for kisspeptin-54 at 27.6 minutes. [9]
The foundational human study gave intravenous boluses to healthy men and saw a rapid, dose-related LH rise. [3] At its top dose that same study saw an inversion, with the higher bolus producing a significantly smaller LH response than the lower one. [3] Continued infusion in those men raised LH, testosterone and LH pulse frequency. [3]
A single-blinded human crossover study compared the two isoforms in healthy men. [10] At the doses tested, continuous intravenous kisspeptin-10 and kisspeptin-54 were associated with similar gonadotropin responses, and GnRH was more potent than either. [10] The authors flagged the small sample size themselves. [10] Those authors also state that kisspeptin-54 but not kisspeptin-10 can be given subcutaneously, because of its longer half-life. [10]
Five days of continuous subcutaneous kisspeptin-10 in healthy men left gonadotropins similar to vehicle, while testosterone remained elevated. [11] That continuous arm enrolled four men. [11] Intermittent exposure over twelve days sustained the gonadotropin rise, and the receptor still responded to a bolus afterwards. [11] That study delivered kisspeptin-10 subcutaneously, so the route judgement is not settled. [10][11] The second human study infused kisspeptin-10 continuously for 24 hours in three men, and LH rose five- to eight-fold before declining 13 to 47 percent from its peak. [12] LH was still several-fold above baseline at the end of that human infusion. [12] With three participants those point estimates are not established parameters. [12] That is a decline from peak rather than the loss of response reported in monkeys. [8][12][23]
In men with type 2 diabetes and low testosterone, a small human proof-of-concept study found kisspeptin-10 raised LH and testosterone. [13] In women with cabergoline-resistant hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea, infused kisspeptin-10 raised LH, FSH and ovarian steroids. [14] That human report enrolled two patients and its authors called it exploratory. [14]
One human study found no gonadotropin change in follicular-phase women by any route tested, with the response returning in the preovulatory phase. [15] A second human study, from an independent group, found significant LH stimulation in early-follicular women. [16] A third human study found unambiguous responses in only half of its early-follicular participants, and raising the dose did not improve them. [17]
The human female response is modulated by sex-steroid background, with responses largest in post-menopausal women and not significant in women taking a combined oral contraceptive. [16] The same human study that examined cycle phase did not find pulse-generator resetting in women. [17] That is a documented failure to extend, by the group that first described the finding in men. [2][17]
No human kisspeptin-10 data on sexual desire, arousal or erectile function were identified, because the trials reporting those outcomes used kisspeptin-54. [4][5][6] In a human study of congenital idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, every patient with persisting disease failed to respond. [18] The authors read that as the GnRH network needing to be functional for kisspeptin to act. [18]
TAK-448, also called MVT-602, is sometimes borrowed as evidence, but PubChem records a distinct nonapeptide with its own CAS number and formula. [24] Its human Phase 1 record showed testosterone falling to below-castration concentrations under sustained exposure. [19] Two Phase 2 studies of it in male hypogonadism were terminated for missing their primary endpoints. [20] Neither result is kisspeptin-10 evidence, and neither should be omitted on that ground. [19][20]
Two registered kisspeptin-10 trials of insulin secretion were withdrawn before enrolling anyone, one for futility and one because the planned enrollment was judged insufficiently powered. [25]
No human kisspeptin-10 study identified has used a clinical endpoint. [3][10][11] Across the published human record the outcomes are biochemical, chiefly LH, FSH, testosterone and other reproductive steroids, over hours to days. [3][10][11][14] The largest human kisspeptin-10 administration study identified enrolled fifteen participants. [11]
Repeated intraperitoneal kisspeptin-10 in prepubertal male rats significantly reduced plasma testosterone and produced ultrastructural degeneration of Leydig cells. [21] Three dose levels were given, and the testosterone reduction reached significance at the two higher ones and not at the lowest. [21] That animal study was small and used prepubertal rats by a non-clinical route. [21]
Kisspeptin-10 is not an approved medicine in any jurisdiction identified. [22] FDA lists it as an active Category 2 bulk drug substance for compounding, dated September 2023. [22] The listed grounds are immunogenicity risk, impurity and characterization complexity, and limited safety information. [22] Several US National Drug Code entries list it as a bulk ingredient from suppliers, which is an administrative listing rather than a review or approval. [22]
Two authors of the 2026 chronic-exposure human study declare consultancy for the company developing a kisspeptin-receptor analogue. [11] The senior author of the 24-hour infusion study declares a financial interest in a reproductive-treatment company. [12] The TAK-448 Phase 1 report is authored largely by sponsor employees, and its finding runs against the sponsor's own commercial thesis. [19]
Group concentration differs by isoform: human kisspeptin-10 studies come from at least four independent groups on three continents. [2][3][15][27] The kisspeptin-54 literature is close to a single group's program, and that is the literature a kisspeptin-10 page is most tempted to borrow. [4][5][6]
Kisspeptin-10 is best described as a well-characterized physiological probe rather than a candidate treatment. [3][10][11] The gonadotropin result depends on the exposure pattern, since continuous and intermittent regimens differed in the same human study. [11] Testosterone stayed elevated under both schedules, so that study showed no reversal of direction. [11] Current human work remains physiological, using kisspeptin-10 to interrogate GnRH pulse generation. [12]
Has any human kisspeptin-10 study measured a clinical outcome? No human kisspeptin-10 study identified has used a clinical endpoint. [3][10][11] Across the published human record the outcomes are biochemical, chiefly LH, FSH, testosterone and other reproductive steroids, over hours to days, and the largest such study enrolled fifteen participants. [3][10][11][14]
Do the human findings in men apply to women? Not directly, and the human female data are inconsistent between groups. [15][16][17] One human study found no follicular-phase gonadotropin response, a second found a significant one, and a third found responses in only half of its early-follicular participants. [15][16][17]
Kisspeptin-10 has a genuine, independently produced human record of small physiological studies of gonadotropin, testosterone and other reproductive steroid release. [3][10][11] Within that record no clinical-outcome trial and no human sexual-function data were identified. [4][5][6][11] Two common errors are importing kisspeptin-54 results and generalizing male findings to women. [4][5][6][15] Kisspeptin-10 remains a research compound with no approved use in any jurisdiction identified. [22]
Kisspeptin-10 is available as a research compound, HPLC-verified with a batch-specific COA.
Chemistry & Handling
Molecular identity, reconstitution, storage, stability, and purity verification.
References
An evidence-led review of VIP and aviptadil research: regulatory status stated precisely, the COVID-19 and ARDS trials, and the erectile dysfunction evidence.
An evidence-led review of PNC-27 research: the human record, FDA findings on material sold to patients, the proposed mechanism, and the cell and animal work.
An evidence-led review of oxytocin research: regulatory status, the delivery question, the autism trials, and the trust and social cognition literature.
An evidence-led review of FOXO4-DRI research: the proposed mechanism, the preclinical findings, the negative and null results, and the human record.
An evidence-led review of ADAMAX: what the published literature contains, the nearest relevant chemistry, and where the seller rationale comes from.
An evidence-led review of ACTH 1-39 research: what it is, the molecules it is not, how it acts, and its regulatory status in the United States.