PTD-DBM Research
PTD-DBM is a CXXC5-blocking peptide studied in cells and mice for wound healing and hair regrowth. ClinicalTrials.gov lists no human trial of it.
Shop by category
Growth Hormone Axis ResearchRegeneration ResearchPeptide BioregulatorsCognitive & Neuropeptide ResearchMetabolic & Cellular ResearchMelanocortin & Endocrine ResearchDermal Peptide ResearchImmune & Thymic ResearchKisspeptin-10 is a synthetic decapeptide used in research on reproductive hormone control. [1] It is the shortest fragment of the human KISS1 gene product that retains full activity at the kisspeptin receptor. [1] Human kisspeptin-10 research consists almost entirely of small physiological studies measuring luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone and other reproductive steroids. [3][10][14] A much larger literature uses kisspeptin-54, a different molecule, and the two must be kept apart. [4][5][6]
Kisspeptin-10 corresponds to residues 112 to 121 of the KISS1 precursor, also written as metastin 45-54, and its sequence is Tyr-Asn-Trp-Asn-Ser-Phe-Gly-Leu-Arg-Phe with a C-terminal amide. [1] PubChem records the free base as C63H83N17O14, molecular weight 1302.4, CAS 374675-21-5. [1] Research-grade Kisspeptin-10 is usually supplied as an acetate or trifluoroacetate salt, which does not conflict with that CAS. [1]
Kisspeptin-54 shares the same C-terminal ten residues but is a 54-residue peptide of far greater mass. [7] Almost every headline human kisspeptin study used kisspeptin-54, including the brain-imaging and sexual-desire trials, so those results are not kisspeptin-10 data. [4][5][6] Kisspeptin-13 and kisspeptin-14 extend the same C-terminus, so residue count needs checking before a paper counts as kisspeptin-10 evidence. [26] Much preclinical work uses the rodent kisspeptin-10 sequence, which ends in tyrosine where the human decapeptide ends in phenylalanine. [26]
Kisspeptin-10 is an agonist at the kisspeptin receptor, also called KISS1R or GPR54. [7] In healthy men, a single intravenous bolus produced an immediate LH pulse and delayed the next endogenous pulse. [2] That points to an action upstream at the GnRH pulse generator rather than at the pituitary. [2] In juvenile rhesus monkeys under continuous exposure, a further kisspeptin bolus no longer evoked LH. [8] GnRH and NMDA boluses still did, placing the desensitization at the receptor with the downstream machinery intact. [8] In adult monkeys the same kind of infusion truncated the bolus response at the lower dose and abolished it at the higher one. [23] There the pituitary response to a GnRH bolus was itself compromised, so the downstream machinery was not intact in adults. [23]
In mice, systemically injected kisspeptin-54, but not kisspeptin-10, activated c-FOS in GnRH neurons behind the blood-brain barrier. [7] Repeated kisspeptin-10 injections given to offset its shorter half-life did not reproduce the sustained LH rise seen after kisspeptin-54, so clearance alone does not explain the gap. [7] The authors attribute it to barrier penetration and pharmacokinetics together. [7] Those half-lives, roughly 32 minutes for kisspeptin-54 and roughly 4 minutes for kisspeptin-10, were measured in mice, not in people. [7] The same authors caution that they gave human peptides to mice, and do not know whether murine kisspeptins behave differently. [7] Human plasma half-life has been reported separately for kisspeptin-54 at 27.6 minutes. [9]
The foundational human study gave intravenous boluses to healthy men and saw a rapid, dose-related LH rise. [3] At its top dose that same study saw an inversion, with the higher bolus producing a significantly smaller LH response than the lower one. [3] Continued infusion in those men raised LH, testosterone and LH pulse frequency. [3]
A single-blinded human crossover study compared the two isoforms in healthy men. [10] At the doses tested, continuous intravenous kisspeptin-10 and kisspeptin-54 were associated with similar gonadotropin responses, and GnRH was more potent than either. [10] The authors flagged the small sample size themselves. [10] Those authors also state that kisspeptin-54 but not kisspeptin-10 can be given subcutaneously, because of its longer half-life. [10]
Five days of continuous subcutaneous kisspeptin-10 in healthy men left gonadotropins similar to vehicle, while testosterone remained elevated. [11] That continuous arm enrolled four men. [11] Intermittent exposure over twelve days sustained the gonadotropin rise, and the receptor still responded to a bolus afterwards. [11] That study delivered kisspeptin-10 subcutaneously, so the route judgement is not settled. [10][11] The second human study infused kisspeptin-10 continuously for 24 hours in three men, and LH rose five- to eight-fold before declining 13 to 47 percent from its peak. [12] LH was still several-fold above baseline at the end of that human infusion. [12] With three participants those point estimates are not established parameters. [12] That is a decline from peak rather than the loss of response reported in monkeys. [8][12][23]
In men with type 2 diabetes and low testosterone, a small human proof-of-concept study found kisspeptin-10 raised LH and testosterone. [13] In women with cabergoline-resistant hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea, infused kisspeptin-10 raised LH, FSH and ovarian steroids. [14] That human report enrolled two patients and its authors called it exploratory. [14]
One human study found no gonadotropin change in follicular-phase women by any route tested, with the response returning in the preovulatory phase. [15] A second human study, from an independent group, found significant LH stimulation in early-follicular women. [16] A third human study found unambiguous responses in only half of its early-follicular participants, and raising the dose did not improve them. [17]
The human female response is modulated by sex-steroid background, with responses largest in post-menopausal women and not significant in women taking a combined oral contraceptive. [16] The same human study that examined cycle phase did not find pulse-generator resetting in women. [17] That is a documented failure to extend, by the group that first described the finding in men. [2][17]
No human kisspeptin-10 data on sexual desire, arousal or erectile function were identified, because the trials reporting those outcomes used kisspeptin-54. [4][5][6] In a human study of congenital idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, every patient with persisting disease failed to respond. [18] The authors read that as the GnRH network needing to be functional for kisspeptin to act. [18]
TAK-448, also called MVT-602, is sometimes borrowed as evidence, but PubChem records a distinct nonapeptide with its own CAS number and formula. [24] Its human Phase 1 record showed testosterone falling to below-castration concentrations under sustained exposure. [19] Two Phase 2 studies of it in male hypogonadism were terminated for missing their primary endpoints. [20] Neither result is kisspeptin-10 evidence, and neither should be omitted on that ground. [19][20]
Two registered kisspeptin-10 trials of insulin secretion were withdrawn before enrolling anyone, one for futility and one because the planned enrollment was judged insufficiently powered. [25]
No human kisspeptin-10 study identified has used a clinical endpoint. [3][10][11] Across the published human record the outcomes are biochemical, chiefly LH, FSH, testosterone and other reproductive steroids, over hours to days. [3][10][11][14] The largest human kisspeptin-10 administration study identified enrolled fifteen participants. [11]
Repeated intraperitoneal kisspeptin-10 in prepubertal male rats significantly reduced plasma testosterone and produced ultrastructural degeneration of Leydig cells. [21] Three dose levels were given, and the testosterone reduction reached significance at the two higher ones and not at the lowest. [21] That animal study was small and used prepubertal rats by a non-clinical route. [21]
Kisspeptin-10 is not an approved medicine in any jurisdiction identified. [22] FDA lists it as an active Category 2 bulk drug substance for compounding, dated September 2023. [22] The listed grounds are immunogenicity risk, impurity and characterization complexity, and limited safety information. [22] Several US National Drug Code entries list it as a bulk ingredient from suppliers, which is an administrative listing rather than a review or approval. [22]
Two authors of the 2026 chronic-exposure human study declare consultancy for the company developing a kisspeptin-receptor analogue. [11] The senior author of the 24-hour infusion study declares a financial interest in a reproductive-treatment company. [12] The TAK-448 Phase 1 report is authored largely by sponsor employees, and its finding runs against the sponsor's own commercial thesis. [19]
Group concentration differs by isoform: human kisspeptin-10 studies come from at least four independent groups on three continents. [2][3][15][27] The kisspeptin-54 literature is close to a single group's program, and that is the literature a kisspeptin-10 page is most tempted to borrow. [4][5][6]
Kisspeptin-10 is best described as a well-characterized physiological probe rather than a candidate treatment. [3][10][11] The gonadotropin result depends on the exposure pattern, since continuous and intermittent regimens differed in the same human study. [11] Testosterone stayed elevated under both schedules, so that study showed no reversal of direction. [11] Current human work remains physiological, using kisspeptin-10 to interrogate GnRH pulse generation. [12]
Kisspeptin-10 has a genuine, independently produced human record of small physiological studies of gonadotropin, testosterone and other reproductive steroid release. [3][10][11] Within that record no clinical-outcome trial and no human sexual-function data were identified. [4][5][6][11] Two common errors are importing kisspeptin-54 results and generalizing male findings to women. [4][5][6][15] Kisspeptin-10 remains a research compound with no approved use in any jurisdiction identified. [22]
No human kisspeptin-10 study identified has used a clinical endpoint. Across the published human record the outcomes are biochemical, chiefly LH, FSH, testosterone and other reproductive steroids, over hours to days, and the largest such study enrolled fifteen participants.
Not directly, and the human female data are inconsistent between groups. One human study found no follicular-phase gonadotropin response, a second found a significant one, and a third found responses in only half of its early-follicular participants.
References
PTD-DBM is a CXXC5-blocking peptide studied in cells and mice for wound healing and hair regrowth. ClinicalTrials.gov lists no human trial of it.
FDA approved bremelanotide only for premenopausal women with acquired, generalized HSDD. Its label says it is not indicated to enhance sexual performance.
An evidence-led review of VIP and aviptadil research: regulatory status stated precisely, the COVID-19 and ARDS trials, and the erectile dysfunction evidence.
An evidence-led review of oxytocin research: regulatory status, the delivery question, the autism trials, and the trust and social cognition literature.
An evidence-led review of ACTH 1-39 research: what it is, the molecules it is not, how it acts, and its regulatory status in the United States.
A receptor-biology look at Melanotan 2 research: peptide structure, melanocortin receptor agonism, and preclinical findings on the MC1R, MC3R, MC4R, and MC5R subtypes.