Free US standard shipping on orders over $150
HomeResearchAICAR Research
Metabolic Research

AICAR Research

Dr. Tharindunee Jayakody, PhDDr. Tharindunee JayakodyPhD
Published 27 August 2026

AICAR research is unusual in one respect. Most research compounds have thin human data. AICAR has a large, modern, and clearly negative human trial record, published under the name acadesine. Its preclinical literature is extensive and often striking. The gap between the two is the most useful thing to understand about it. This article summarizes what the published evidence has investigated. It describes research findings, not outcomes anyone should expect.

What AICAR is

AICAR is a nucleoside, not a peptide. Chemically it is 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-D-ribofuranoside. It is also called acadesine or AICA riboside. PubChem lists it as CID 17513 under CAS 2627-69-2, with the formula C9H14N4O5 and a molecular weight of 258.23 g/mol.

Its phosphorylated form is a separate molecule with its own record. That form is ZMP, also called AICA ribotide, listed as PubChem CID 65110, formula C9H15N4O8P, molecular weight 338.21 g/mol. The difference between the two is exactly one phosphate group.

Naming in this field is inconsistent and causes real confusion. Some papers use AICAR for the nucleoside and ZMP for the phosphate. Others reverse it. Here, AICAR means the nucleoside and ZMP the phosphate.

AICAR AMPK activation: what actually does the activating

This is the central point, and it is often stated loosely. AICAR is a precursor. It does not act on AMP-activated protein kinase itself.

The sequence has three steps. AICAR is carried into cells by nucleoside transporters rather than crossing the membrane freely.[1] Once inside, adenosine kinase phosphorylates it to ZMP, and does so without the usual feedback restraint, so ZMP accumulates.[2] ZMP then resembles AMP closely enough to act on AMPK in its place.[3]

Two experiments carry most of the weight. Blocking nucleoside transport prevents AICAR from activating AMPK in cells.[1] Blocking adenosine kinase, the enzyme that makes ZMP, also abolishes the effect.[4] If the nucleoside were doing the work, neither block should matter. ZMP itself is poorly membrane permeable, which is why the nucleoside exists as a delivery form.[5]

Research-grade AICAR is supplied as the nucleoside, so the conversion step sits inside every mechanistic claim made about it.

One honest gap is worth stating. No published experiment appears to have applied the unphosphorylated nucleoside directly to purified AMPK and reported it inactive. The case rests on the convergent cell-based evidence above rather than on a single decisive cell-free comparison.

Describing AICAR as an AMPK activator is therefore reasonable shorthand for what happens in a cell. It is inaccurate as a description of mechanism.

What ZMP does at the enzyme

ZMP binds the regulatory gamma subunit of AMPK, at the same nucleotide sites AMP occupies. A crystal structure of the human gamma1 subunit domain pair resolved both AMP and ZMP in place.[6] That work came from a commercial structural biology group.

ZMP is a much weaker activator than AMP. Direct measurement on kinase purified from rat liver found it needed far higher concentrations for the same effect.[3] The size of the gap depended on how much ATP was present. Review-level sources put it at roughly forty to fifty times weaker.

Whether ZMP reaches the same maximum as AMP is unsettled. The rat liver work reported equal maximal activation.[3] A later study using purified recombinant human enzyme reported that maximal activity was not reached.[7] Different enzyme sources and assay formats may explain it. It has not been resolved.

One further caution belongs here. Reviews often say ZMP protects the enzyme from being switched off by dephosphorylation. That claim traces back to work on AMP rather than ZMP, and the original AMP finding was itself later reinterpreted as an artifact of contaminated preparations.[8] It should not be stated as established for ZMP.

AICAR metabolism beyond AMPK

AICAR is not a clean tool, and the field has said so directly. A 2021 systematic review concluded that many effects previously attributed to AMPK activation are AMPK-independent, and called for caution in interpreting AICAR-based studies.[9]

Several specific examples are documented:

  • In rat liver mitochondria, AICAR inhibited oxidative phosphorylation independently of AMPK.[10]
  • In mouse adipocytes, AICAR reduced insulin-stimulated glucose uptake through a mechanism that required conversion to ZMP but did not involve AMPK.[11]
  • In rat brain slices, AICAR competed with adenosine at the transporter, raising extracellular adenosine and activating adenosine receptors, a confound entirely separate from AMPK.[1]

The second example matters most for interpretation. Requiring ZMP does not mean acting through AMPK.

AICAR research on energy metabolism in animals

In perfused rat hindlimb muscle, AICAR activated AMPK, inactivated acetyl-CoA carboxylase, and increased fatty acid oxidation and glucose uptake.[12] This is an isolated limb preparation, not a whole animal.

The most quoted result is a 2008 mouse study. Sedentary mice given AICAR for four weeks ran 44% longer on a treadmill, alongside induction of metabolic genes.[13] It is a mouse result, in sedentary animals, measured as treadmill endurance. No human trial of endurance or exercise capacity has been published.

Acadesine research in humans

Here the picture changes sharply.

In cardiac surgery, three randomized trials in the 1990s each missed their primary endpoints. A 1997 individual-patient meta-analysis pooling five trials and 4,043 patients then reported reductions in perioperative myocardial infarction and cardiac death.[14] That pooled result is the source of nearly every positive claim about acadesine in circulation.

It did not hold. RED-CABG, a phase 3 trial across 300 sites in seven countries, was stopped for futility. The primary composite outcome occurred in 5.0% of placebo patients and 5.1% on acadesine, an odds ratio of 1.01.[15] In hematology, a phase I/II study in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia produced no conventional responses.[16]

No regulator has approved acadesine for any indication.

Two human studies measured what the compound actually did to AMPK in skeletal muscle. Both found AMPK phosphorylation and activity unchanged, even where glucose uptake rose.[17][18] A separate infusion study confirmed that AICAR is taken up and phosphorylated to ZMP in human red blood cells, while finding no effect on glucose disposal.[19] One human positive stands out: in type 2 diabetes, intravenous AICAR reduced hepatic glucose output.[18]

Limitations and research directions

The most practically important human finding is pharmacokinetic. In a phase I study that gave both oral and intravenous doses, oral bioavailability was under 5%.[20] The cardiac surgery trials and the metabolic studies described above all used intravenous infusion.

AICAR falls under section S4 of the World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List, covering hormone and metabolic modulators, and is prohibited at all times. Sub-numbering within that section is revised annually and is not cited here.

What the literature does not establish is substantial. There is no human evidence for endurance, fat oxidation, mitochondrial adaptation, or body composition. The two human studies that looked for AMPK activation in muscle did not find it.

Conclusion

AICAR is a nucleoside precursor. Its intracellular phosphate, ZMP, is the species that acts on AMPK. It does so more weakly than AMP, and less selectively than its reputation suggests. Preclinical work in rodents established it as the standard laboratory tool for raising AMPK activity, with striking metabolic and endurance findings. A large and well-conducted human program tested the cardiac hypothesis and failed.

The distinction between what is administered and what acts is the thing to carry into any paper on this compound. AICAR and ZMP are different molecules, and the literature does not always make clear which one it means.

AICAR is a research compound, supplied for laboratory research use only.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are AICAR and ZMP the same thing? No, and the distinction is central to reading this literature correctly. AICAR is the administered nucleoside, C9H14N4O5 at 258.23 g/mol. ZMP is the phosphate formed inside the cell by adenosine kinase, C9H15N4O8P at 338.21 g/mol. It is ZMP that binds AMPK's regulatory gamma subunit in AMP's place.[2][3] Blocking either the transporter that carries AICAR into cells or the kinase that converts it abolishes AMPK activation, which is the direct evidence for that sequence.[1][4] Naming is inconsistent across the literature, and some papers use AICAR for the phosphate, so check which molecule a given paper means.

Has AICAR (acadesine) been tested in humans? Yes, more extensively than most research compounds in this catalog, and the program failed. Three cardiac surgery trials in the 1990s each missed their primary endpoints. A 1997 meta-analysis pooling those same trials then reported reduced perioperative cardiac events.[14] The follow-up RED-CABG trial in 3,080 patients was stopped for futility, with no difference from placebo.[15] Two further studies found no measurable AMPK activation in human skeletal muscle.[17][18]

Is AICAR a selective AMPK activator? No. A 2021 systematic review concluded that many effects previously attributed to AMPK activation are AMPK-independent, and called for caution in using AICAR as a proxy for AMPK signaling.[9] Documented examples include inhibition of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation independently of AMPK,[10] and an effect in adipocytes that required conversion to ZMP but did not involve AMPK.[11]

Is AICAR approved for any medical use? No. A search of the FDA's approved-product records returns no product containing acadesine, and no drug label mentions it. Acadesine holds a European orphan designation for B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, granted in 2005. An orphan designation is a development incentive, not a marketing authorization, as the register itself states.

References

  1. 1
    Gadalla AE, Pearson T, Currie AJ, Dale N, Hawley SA, Sheehan M, et al. AICA riboside both activates AMP-activated protein kinase and competes with adenosine for the nucleoside transporter in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus. J Neurochem. 2004;88(5):1272-1282. PMID 15009683.
  2. 2
    Sabina RL, Patterson D, Holmes EW. 5-Amino-4-imidazolecarboxamide riboside (Z-riboside) metabolism in eukaryotic cells. J Biol Chem. 1985;260(10):6107-6114. PMID 3997815.
  3. 3
    Henin N, Vincent MF, Van den Berghe G. Stimulation of rat liver AMP-activated protein kinase by AMP analogues. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1290(2):197-203. PMID 8645724.
  4. 4
    Boß M, Newbatt Y, Gupta S, Collins I, Brüne B, Namgaladze D. AMPK-independent inhibition of human macrophage ER stress response by AICAR. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32111. doi:10.1038/srep32111. PMID 27562249.
  5. 5
    Hunter RW, Foretz M, Bultot L, Fullerton MD, Deak M, Ross FA, et al. Mechanism of action of compound-13: an alpha1-selective small molecule activator of AMPK. Chem Biol. 2014;21(7):866-879. PMID 25036776.
  6. 6
    Day P, Sharff A, Parra L, Cleasby A, Williams M, Hörer S, et al. Structure of a CBS-domain pair from the regulatory gamma1 subunit of human AMPK in complex with AMP and ZMP. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2007;63(Pt 5):587-596. PMID 17452784.
  7. 7
    Suter M, Riek U, Tuerk R, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Neumann D. Dissecting the role of 5'-AMP for allosteric stimulation, activation, and deactivation of AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(43):32207-32216. PMID 16943194.
  8. 8
    Sanders MJ, Grondin PO, Hegarty BD, Snowden MA, Carling D. Investigating the mechanism for AMP activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Biochem J. 2007;403(1):139-148. PMID 17147517.
  9. 9
    Višnjić D, Lalić H, Dembitz V, Tomić B, Smoljo T. AICAr, a widely used AMPK activator with important AMPK-independent effects: a systematic review. Cells. 2021;10(5):1095. doi:10.3390/cells10051095. PMID 34064363.
  10. 10
    Guigas B, Taleux N, Foretz M, Detaille D, Andreelli F, Viollet B, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase-independent inhibition of hepatic mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation by AICA riboside. Biochem J. 2007;404(3):499-507. PMID 17324122.
  11. 11
    Alshuweishi Y, Almalki A, Alshuweishi F, Salt IP. AICAR inhibits insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes via an AMPK-independent, ZMP-dependent mechanism. Cells. 2025;14(22):1811. doi:10.3390/cells14221811. PMID 41294864.
  12. 12
    Merrill GF, Kurth EJ, Hardie DG, Winder WW. AICA riboside increases AMP-activated protein kinase, fatty acid oxidation, and glucose uptake in rat muscle. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(6):E1107-E1112. PMID 9435525.
  13. 13
    Narkar VA, Downes M, Yu RT, Embler E, Wang YX, Banayo E, et al. AMPK and PPARdelta agonists are exercise mimetics. Cell. 2008;134(3):405-415. PMID 18674809.
  14. 14
    Mangano DT. Effects of acadesine on myocardial infarction, stroke, and death following surgery. A meta-analysis of the 5 international randomized trials. JAMA. 1997;277(4):325-332. PMID 9002496.
  15. 15
    Newman MF, Ferguson TB, White JA, Ambrosio G, Koglin J, Nussmeier NA, et al. Effect of adenosine-regulating agent acadesine on morbidity and mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting: the RED-CABG randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;308(2):157-164. PMID 22782417.
  16. 16
    Van Den Neste E, Cazin B, Janssens A, González-Barca E, Terol MJ, Levy V, et al. Acadesine for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): a multicenter phase I/II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71(3):581-591. PMID 23228986.
  17. 17
    Cuthbertson DJ, Babraj JA, Mustard KJ, Towler MC, Green KA, Wackerhage H, et al. 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide 1-beta-D-ribofuranoside acutely stimulates skeletal muscle 2-deoxyglucose uptake in healthy men. Diabetes. 2007;56(8):2078-2084. PMID 17513706.
  18. 18
    Boon H, Bosselaar M, Praet SF, Blaak EE, Saris WH, Wagenmakers AJ, et al. Intravenous AICAR administration reduces hepatic glucose output and inhibits whole body lipolysis in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 2008;51(10):1893-1900. PMID 18709353.
  19. 19
    Bosselaar M, Smits P, van Loon LJ, Tack CJ. Intravenous AICAR during hyperinsulinemia induces systemic hemodynamic changes but has no local metabolic effect. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51(10):1449-1458. PMID 21148051.
  20. 20
    Dixon R, Gourzis J, McDermott D, Fujitaki J, Dewland P, Gruber H. AICA-riboside: safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of a novel adenosine-regulating agent. J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;31(4):342-347. PMID 2037706.
Dr. Tharindunee Jayakody, PhD

WRITTEN BY

Dr. Tharindunee Jayakody

PhD — Scientific Contributor and Reviewer

Dr Jayakody is a molecular pharmacologist with over 15 years of experience in translating complex research into clear, evidence-based explanations, with expertise on peptide therapeutics and other emerging compounds, particularly in delineating the mechanisms of action of therapeutics. As a contributor to research-focused platforms, Dr Jayakody aims to give scientifically literate readers a balanced view of what current data can and cannot support, helping them understand how promising findings in the lab translate, or sometimes fail to translate, into real-world applications.

View team profile

Your Cart

Your cart is empty

Add some research compounds to get started.

Browse Products