PYY 3-36 Research
PYY 3-36 research: human appetite infusion findings, a contested rodent replication record, dose-limiting nausea, and a Phase 2 trial that missed.
Shop by category
Growth Hormone Axis ResearchRegeneration ResearchPeptide BioregulatorsCognitive & Neuropeptide ResearchMetabolic & Cellular ResearchMelanocortin & Endocrine ResearchDermal Peptide ResearchImmune & Thymic ResearchResearch & info
Research HubReference LibraryEducationCompareBlogCOAsContactAboutFAQCalculatorGlossaryReviewed by Dr. Martina Rossi, PhD
Scientific Contributor and Reviewer · Reviewed

PNC-27 research is entirely preclinical, and every efficacy finding described below comes from cell culture or from animal models [18]. No registered clinical trial of this peptide has ever existed, in any registry checked [18].
PNC-27 is a 32-residue synthetic chimeric peptide, joining residues 12 to 26 of human p53, the HDM-2 binding domain, to a 17-residue membrane-residency leader [1][2]. That leader is KKWKMRRNQFWVKVQRG, derived from the Drosophila Antennapedia homeodomain, and the primary literature calls it the penetratin or Antp sequence [1][11]. It is a modified variant rather than penetratin as usually written, RQIKIWFQNRRMKWKK. PubChem records CAS 1159861-00-3 as CID 16201774, with a formula and molecular weight matching the published 32-residue sequence [2][20].
Searches of ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register, CTIS and ISRCTN return zero registered trials for PNC-27, OM-301 or Oncolyze [18].
One ex vivo study used human tumor tissue without dosing a patient [6]. PNC-27 was cytotoxic to primary epithelial ovarian cancer cells isolated from two patients [6]. The control peptide PNC-29 was not cytotoxic to those cells [6]. Those cells were treated in a dish, and no patient received the peptide [6].
There is also no safety database, and openFDA queries return no adverse event and no enforcement records for PNC-27 [22]. That absence reflects a lack of surveillance rather than tolerability [18][22].
In January 2017 the FDA warned consumers not to buy or use PNC-27, then sold through a website as a cancer treatment [17]. An FDA laboratory had found the bacterium Variovorax paradoxus in a PNC-27 solution sample for inhalation [17]. The agency repeats that finding on its live health fraud page [16].
In a 27 March 2017 page update, the FDA reported Ralstonia insidiosa in another PNC-27 inhalation sample [17].
That same page records PNC-27 being sold in several dosage forms, including nebulized and intravenous solutions and suppositories [17]. As of 27 March 2017 the agency had received no illness reports related to PNC-27 [17].
The originating laboratory argues that PNC-27 binds HDM-2 displayed on the outer plasma membrane of cancer cells and forms pores [3][11]. Solution NMR showed amphipathic helix-coil-helix structures in membrane-mimetic solvent, the property proposed to explain membrane disruption [2]. In vitro, HDM-2 was detected in the membranes of several cancer cell lines but not in several untransformed lines [3]. Transfecting membrane-targeted HDM-2 into a resistant untransformed line made it susceptible in vitro [3]. Immuno-scanning electron microscopy found labeled PNC-27 and HDM-2 in ring-shaped structures at pores on cancer cells in vitro [11]. No pores formed in the untransformed fibroblasts treated in that same work [11]. In vitro work also indicates that the intact chimera does the killing, and that the naked p53 fragment without the leader is inactive [4][15].
The founding paper reported no effect on normal cells in culture, including human cord blood derived stem cells [1]. It also reported killing in p53 null cancer cells in culture, so the proposed mechanism is p53 independent [1].
The strongest independent result is in acute myeloid leukemia [9]. An independent group reported membrane HDM-2 on human and mouse AML blasts in vitro, but not on normal hematopoietic stem cells [9]. In mouse transplant experiments, PNC-27 killed both bulk blasts and leukemia stem cells [9]. That animal work supports the selectivity phenotype, while proposing a different mechanism involving E-cadherin ubiquitination and degradation rather than pore formation [9].
A second independent group contradicts the strong version of that selectivity [5]. Yang and colleagues measured PNC-27 IC50 values of 15 to 20 micromolar in tumor cell lines, against above 50 micromolar in normal cell lines, in vitro [5]. That is a window of roughly two to three fold [5]. PNC-27 was not without effect on normal cells in that study [5]. Swapping the Antennapedia leader for other carriers abolished selectivity in vitro, and pairing that same leader with unrelated cargoes recreated it [5]. They concluded that the p53-derived domain does not determine selectivity [5]. They proposed instead that the leader binds chondroitin sulfate on tumor cell surfaces, with death by mitochondrial disruption [5]. Removing endogenous chondroitin sulfate reduced killing in tumor cells in vitro [5]. They also frame that death as apoptosis, against the originating group's necrosis and pore model [5][12].
No published rebuttal has been found sixteen years on, and the originating group's 2024 mechanism review neither cites Yang and colleagues nor discusses chondroitin sulfate [12]. That group's own wording is also softer than the popular framing, since its 2024 review describes untransformed cell lines as expressing low or no observable membrane HDM-2 [12]. Low is not zero, so selectivity on their own account is a concentration-dependent window [12]. Their most recent in vitro study reports an IC50 of 12.4 micromolar against a cervical carcinoma line, with an untransformed cervical line reported unaffected [13].
A third independent group used PNC-27 as a targeting ligand rather than testing its selectivity claim [8]. A PNC-27 liposome conjugate improved doxorubicin efficacy in an HDM2-positive mouse colon tumor model, but not in an HDM2-negative mouse melanoma model [8]. That animal result is consistent with HDM2 dependence [8]. That study tested a conjugate rather than the free peptide [8]. A fourth independent group used these peptides as delivery ligands, not as a test of selectivity [23].
The remaining evidence cited here is one author network repeating one assay design across ovarian, colon, cervical and leukemia cell lines [7][10][13]. A mouse ovarian model from that network reported that cells surviving paclitaxel raised surface MDM-2 and became more susceptible to PNC-27 [7]. Apart from the conjugate study, no independent replication for any solid tumor indication in a live animal was found [8][9]. The pancreatic in vivo work most often quoted in this space used PNC-28, a different peptide [14].
PNC-27 is not an approved medicine in the United States [16][22]. FDA's orphan drug database records three designations for this peptide's sequence, all held by the sponsor of OM-301: acute myeloid leukemia (January 2022), multiple myeloma (March 2023) and osteosarcoma (December 2023) [24]. Orphan designation is a development incentive, and it is not approval, not evidence of efficacy, and not evidence of safety [19].
The sponsor stated an intention to open a first-in-human phase 1/2 trial of OM-301 in 2023 [19]. As of August 2026 no such trial appears in any registry checked [18]. European agency status could not be verified here, and no European application of any kind was found [18].
One author network, spanning SUNY Downstate, Drexel and Thomas Jefferson, produced most of this evidence base [12]. Several of its papers sit in a single low-impact quarterly [6][7][13]. US patent 8,822,419, filed on 2 October 2009, names three of the PNAS 2010 authors as inventors and claims PNC-27 [21]. That PNAS paper, published online in January 2010, declares no conflict of interest [3]. The same group's 2022 paper does disclose the patents properly [11]. Its 2024 review discloses one author's company employment, then states that the remaining authors had no commercial relationship [12]. One of those remaining authors is a named inventor on that patent [21].
The strongest independent study is independent in authorship but not in materials, because Wang and colleagues declare that Oncolyze supplied PNC-27 and its controls [9].
PNC-27 is an early-stage research peptide, and no human has ever received it in a registered trial [18]. Its selectivity phenotype has partial independent support in an animal leukemia model [9]. Both the size of that selectivity and its mechanism are disputed by an in vitro study, and no published reply from the originating group has been found [5][12]. FDA laboratories also found bacterial contamination in consumer-channel PNC-27 twice in 2017 [17].
No registered human trial of PNC-27 has ever existed, in any of the registries checked. One ex vivo study treated primary ovarian cancer cells from two patients in a dish, and no patient received the peptide.
They are different peptides, and PNC-28 is a shorter analog built from p53 residues 17 to 26. PNC-26 and PNC-29 are control peptides rather than active compounds.
The picture is split rather than settled. One independent group supported the selectivity phenotype in mouse AML models, while proposing a different mechanism of killing. A second independent group measured a window of roughly two to three fold in vitro, and attributed it to the leader sequence.
Orphan designation is a development incentive, not approval, and not evidence of efficacy or safety. FDA's orphan drug database lists three designations for this peptide's sequence, for acute myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma and osteosarcoma, all held by the sponsor of OM-301.
References

Reviewed for scientific accuracy
Dr. Martina Rossi, PhD
PhD, Université Grenoble Alpes · Scientific Contributor and Reviewer
Dr. Rossi's doctoral research at Université Grenoble Alpes examined the vascular functions of bone morphogenetic proteins. Her peer-reviewed work spans cell and molecular biology, vascular biology, and gene therapy, in journals including Cardiovascular Research, Scientific Reports, and Brain Sciences. She reviews Pure Peptides' product, reference, and research pages for scientific accuracy against the sources they cite.
PYY 3-36 research: human appetite infusion findings, a contested rodent replication record, dose-limiting nausea, and a Phase 2 trial that missed.
GDF-8 is myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle mass. No published or registered human study has given it to a person. Inhibitor data are separate.
Follistatin 344 is a protein, not a peptide. The five ClinicalTrials.gov studies using it as the intervention delivered a gene, not an injected protein.
ACE-031 is an ActRIIB-Fc fusion protein. Its Duchenne trial was stopped early for nosebleeds and telangiectasias, and it holds no FDA or EMA approval.
An evidence-led review of FOXO4-DRI research: the proposed mechanism, the preclinical findings, the negative and null results, and the human record.
An evidence-led review of SS-31 research: its regulatory status stated in full, how small the pivotal evidence is, and the trials that missed.