Tesamorelin Research
An evidence-led review of tesamorelin research: what its approval covers and what it does not, and what the human trials actually found.
GHRP-2, also called pralmorelin, is a synthetic six-amino-acid peptide with the sequence D-Ala-D-2-Nal-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2. Chemistry databases list it under CAS 158861-67-7 and PubChem CID 6918245, formula C45H55N9O6 [1]. The codes KP-102 and GPA 748 name the same molecule [1][2]. Material sold as GHRP-2 is supplied for laboratory research use only, and is not for human consumption.
It is an agonist at the growth hormone secretagogue receptor GHS-R1a, cloned from pig and human pituitary tissue, whose natural ligand is ghrelin [3][4] (in vitro, animal).
Human data on GHRP-2 exist, and they are narrow: they cover acute endocrine response to single administration, one validated diagnostic use, and one short study of repeated administration. Registry searches return no registered interventional trials for GHRP-2 or pralmorelin [5]. Most of this human work predates mandatory registration. Nothing in the record addresses body composition, lean mass, fat loss, strength or performance.
In six healthy young adults, GHRP-2 and hexarelin released more growth hormone than GHRH did, and both also raised prolactin, ACTH and cortisol [6] (human). Prolactin release was lower than TRH produced, while ACTH and cortisol release matched that of human CRH, a maximal stimulus to the adrenal axis [6]. The authors concluded that these peptides are not fully specific [6]. Six subjects received every comparator in one crossover, which is very small, and administration was single and intravenous. GHRP-6 was never given in that study, despite frequent citation to the contrary.
A second human dataset supports the size of the cortisol effect. In 15 patients investigated for suspected hypopituitarism, peak cortisol during a GHRP-2 test tracked the insulin tolerance test closely, at r=0.817 and p<0.0001 [7] (human). That was a pilot study without a healthy control group [7].
Why cortisol rises is unresolved: two human hexarelin studies disagree over whether vasopressin mediates it [8][9] (human), and a rat study of GHRP-2 found it mainly CRF mediated [10] (animal). In conscious swine GHRP-2 raised ACTH and cortisol, but prolactin did not rise there [11] (animal).
Copy describing GHRP-2 as a selective growth hormone releaser is contradicted by the human data; that selectivity claim was made for ipamorelin, a different molecule [6][11].
Nine healthy young men received GHRP-2 across five consecutive days [12] (human). The growth hormone response attenuated measurably, with mean peak values falling from 83 to 59 to 51 µg/L, ANOVA p<0.01. Serum IGF-1 did not rise at all, sitting between 22 and 25 nmol/L on every day measured [12]. Osteocalcin did rise, from 3.2 to 4.2 µg/L, p<0.01, so some tissue-level growth hormone effect did occur [12]. Five days is short, and the authors did not claim a later rise had been excluded. It is the only human measurement of IGF-1 across repeated GHRP-2 administration, and it was flat.
Circulating IGF-1 is associated with the risk of several common cancers in a meta-regression of case-control studies, including studies nested in cohorts [13] (human). Those associations come from lifelong endogenous IGF-1 across its normal range, not from an administered peptide. GHRP-2 has not been shown to raise IGF-1 in a person at all [12], so this article does not attach that literature to it. Where it does have a human anchor is tesamorelin, whose label quantifies the IGF-1 rise and carries a neoplasm warning [14]. Growth hormone is diabetogenic in humans [15] (review), and FDA's GHRP-2 entry cites reports of increased insulin requirement [16]. That is a regulator's stated concern, not a measured effect size.
GHRP-2 is often described as approved in Japan, and that claim needs care. A 2004 commercial development profile records that Kaken Pharmaceutical held worldwide rights, and that the compound was awaiting approval there as a diagnostic agent [2]. A validation study in 77 healthy subjects and 58 patients with growth hormone deficiency followed [17] (human), and the test appears in Japanese practice literature through 2023 [18]. Peak growth hormone came within 60 minutes in every subject, and averaged 1.36 µg/L in patients against 84.6 µg/L in controls [17]. The approval grant could not be confirmed against any primary regulatory database, so it is reported and unverified. The use is a diagnostic provocative test, a single challenge to see whether the pituitary responds, which is categorically different from a therapeutic approval. US development for growth hormone deficiency was discontinued [2].
Tesamorelin holds FDA approval, granted 10 November 2010 and still in force, for reduction of excess abdominal fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy [19]. It never obtained a European marketing authorization, and it was not refused: the applicant withdrew that application while it was under CHMP review [20]. The approval belongs to the molecule tesamorelin and to one indication. It is not a family credential and must never be written as one. Tesamorelin acts at the GHRH receptor while GHRP-2 acts at GHS-R1a, so findings do not transfer between them. The honest contrast is not that tesamorelin works and the others might too. It is that tesamorelin is the only one of the nine compounds in this family that has been through the process that would let anyone know.
FDA placed GHRP-2 on its Category 2 list of bulk drug substances that may present significant safety risks [16]. Its stated concerns include immunogenicity from impurities, and reports of increased insulin requirement, infection, pancreatitis and deaths among critically ill study subjects [16]. FDA states that causality has not been established, and those deaths concern critically ill populations rather than healthy people [16]. Pralmorelin is named in Section S2 of the 2026 WADA Prohibited List, prohibited at all times [21]. Chronic administration has been studied only in animal models [22] (animal). A 2026 review of this class lists prolactin and cortisol elevation, appetite change and dysglycemia among recognized adverse-effect domains [23] (review).
Several sources above are not disinterested. The 2004 profile is a pipeline summary compiled from company disclosures [2], and the rat mechanism study was run by the company holding commercial rights [10]. The swine comparison was authored at Novo Nordisk, which was developing ipamorelin, the compound that emerged from it favorably [11]. The diagnostic validation study is academic work, run inside the Japanese regulatory program in which Kaken commercialized that test [17]. The 2026 review declares no commercial relationships [23].
Is GHRP-2 approved anywhere? It is reported to be approved in Japan as a diagnostic agent, unconfirmed against any primary regulatory database [2]. A diagnostic provocative test is categorically different from a therapeutic approval, and the one documented approval in this family belongs to tesamorelin [19].
Does GHRP-2 raise IGF-1 in people? Not on the evidence available: the one human study measuring IGF-1 across five days of administration found it flat throughout, while the growth hormone response attenuated [12]. No longer human measurement of GHRP-2 exists.
What human evidence exists for muscle or fat loss? None specific to GHRP-2: the human record covers acute endocrine responses, a diagnostic application and one five-day study [5][6][12][17]. No body-composition, lean-mass or performance endpoint has been measured, and the chronic data are animal only [22].
GHRP-2 is available as a research compound, HPLC-verified with a batch-specific COA.
Chemistry & Handling
Molecular identity, reconstitution, storage, stability, and purity verification.
Certificate of Analysis
Batch PP/GH2/062026 · 99.478% purity by HPLC · certified Jul 2026
References
An evidence-led review of tesamorelin research: what its approval covers and what it does not, and what the human trials actually found.
An evidence-led review of MGF research: what the splice variant is, its contested receptor and laboratory record, and the state of the human evidence.
An evidence-led review of IGF-1 LR3 research: weaker binding at the same receptor, what has been measured, and why the half-life claim runs backwards.
An evidence-led review of IGF-1 DES research: the same receptor as IGF-1 but different binding-protein behaviour, what has been measured, and in what.
An evidence-led review of HGH Fragment 176-191 research: which molecule the work was actually done on, the animal findings, and the human evidence.
An evidence-led review of Hexarelin research: two receptors rather than one, desensitization on repeated dosing, and the human and rat cardiac findings.