PE-22-28 Research
A spadin-derived peptide designed to block TREK-1, PE-22-28 has three preclinical papers, no independent replication and no trial on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Orexin-B, also called hypocretin-2, is a 28-residue neuropeptide first described in the hypothalamus. Orexin-B research is a small literature. A live PubMed count on 2026-08-28 returned 81 records with orexin-B in the title, against 868 for orexin-A. Many of the 81 orexin-B title records are tissue-localization and reproductive-tissue studies, concentrated in pigs and extending to species such as gecko, tilapia and piranha. The mammalian central pharmacology base is smaller again. Most popular orexin knowledge comes from the orexin-A work, and it is not evidence about orexin-B.
Sakurai and colleagues described both orexins in 1998, as two peptides cleaved from one precursor and activating the receptors OX1R and OX2R [1]. In that origin study, central administration of either peptide increased food consumption in rats [1].
The two are not variants of one another. Orexin-B is a linear 28-residue peptide with an amidated C terminus and no disulfide bonds. Orexin-A is 33 residues, blocked at its N terminus and held by two internal disulfide bonds. Solution NMR of human orexin-B shows two alpha helices joined by a short linker [2].
Two different CAS registry numbers circulate for this one molecule in public compound databases, so two spec sheets can describe the same 28-mer. "Oroxin B" is an unrelated plant flavonoid glycoside, separated from Orexin-B by a single substituted letter.
Orexin-B is widely called OX2R-selective, but the primary data support a preference rather than selectivity. The affinity figures usually quoted, roughly 36 nM at OX2R against roughly 420 nM at OX1R, trace to Sakurai 1998 and amount to roughly a ten to twelve-fold preference [1]. Those figures do not appear in the paper's abstract. The IUPHAR Guide to Pharmacology lists orexin-B as a full agonist at both receptors, with overlapping potency ranges.
Genuine OX2R selectivity in a peptide required engineering. Asahi and colleagues made [Ala11, D-Leu15]orexin-B and reported roughly 400-fold OX2R selectivity in cell assays [3]. Lang and colleagues later produced truncated analogues exceeding 1000-fold selectivity in vitro [4]. Those are designed molecules, and their selectivity data do not describe the parent peptide.
Kastin and Akerstrom compared the two peptides in mice [5]. Radiolabeled orexin-A entered the brain rapidly from blood by simple diffusion and reached brain tissue intact [5]. Orexin-B was rapidly degraded in blood, and no intact labeled orexin-B was detectable in brain after peripheral injection [5]. It was also far less lipophilic, by roughly eight-fold on the octanol/buffer partition coefficient [5]. This is a mouse result. A sheep study tested food intake after intravenous delivery of porcine orexin-B rather than brain entry [7].
The in vivo record fits that constraint. Among positive orexin-B results in animals with a stated route, all but one used delivery directly into the brain.
The literature does contain one peripheral-route positive. Dyer and colleagues gave synthetic porcine orexin-B by intramuscular injection to 26 weanling piglets [6]. Treated pigs ate an additional meal at 12 hours, and total 24-hour feed intake improved by 18 percent [6]. The intramuscular exposure per unit body weight was about a thousand times the intravenous exposure that did nothing in sheep [6][7]. The study reported no mechanism and demonstrated no central access. It is a single agricultural study from 1999 with no replication.
Sartin and colleagues found that intravenous porcine orexin-B had no effect on food intake, metabolites or hormone concentrations in sheep, while central delivery raised feed intake [7]. Central delivery also raised plasma cortisol in those sheep [7].
Four side-by-side studies returned a signal for orexin-A and none for orexin-B:
The chick result matters for a common inference: the approved orexin antagonists are insomnia drugs, which invites the reasoning that an orexin agonist must promote wakefulness. Orexin-B's own arousal test was negative [8].
Orexin-B is not a diluted orexin-A. In rat midbrain cultures where dopamine neurons die spontaneously, orexin-B gave partial but significant protection, while orexin-A had only marginal effects [11]. An OX2R antagonist abolished the protection and an engineered OX2R-selective analogue reproduced it [11]. This is cell culture.
Two groups report the same direction in rodent MPTP parkinsonian models. Bian and colleagues found that intracerebroventricular orexin-B excited nigral dopaminergic neurons through OX2R and improved motor measures in mice [12]. Ma and colleagues reported reduced dopamine neuron loss in MPTP mice and reduced MPP+ toxicity in SH-SY5Y cells [13]. The route of orexin-B delivery in that animal arm is not stated in the abstract. Neither report has been replicated in a third laboratory.
The same peptide also kills cells, through the receptor it prefers less. Nicole and colleagues used alanine scanning in cells expressing OX1R to map the orexin-B residues driving OX1R-mediated apoptosis [14]. That group had earlier reported orexin-induced apoptosis in colon cancer lines [14]. This is receptor-mediated pharmacology of the peptide in vitro, not an incidental toxicity.
In rat brain slices, orexin-B depressed glutamatergic input to dorsal raphe serotonin neurons through retrograde endocannabinoid signaling, which the authors call surprising for a wake-promoting peptide [15]. In isolated neonatal rat brainstem-spinal cord preparations, orexin-B antagonized respiratory depression induced by sevoflurane, propofol and remifentanil [16]. Sevoflurane reversal required the higher of two concentrations tested, while propofol and the lower remifentanil concentration were antagonized at the lower one [16].
Rotondo and colleagues found by circular dichroism that orexin-B is unordered in water and helical only in membrane-mimetic media [17]. Oxidative conditions oxidized its C-terminal methionine, a residue the alanine scan flagged as binding-critical [14][17]. Deamidation at the Asn-His site was a second degradation route in that work [17].
No person has received orexin-B in a registered trial. A live ClinicalTrials.gov check on 2026-08-28 returned no study in which orexin-B or hypocretin-2 is the intervention. Term searches on that registry return hits such as orexin-antagonist trials and observational studies of endogenous orexin levels, not the peptide. There is no human pharmacokinetic, safety or dose-finding data for this peptide.
Orexin-B is not an approved drug in the United States. Drugs@FDA queries by active ingredient and by brand name return no application of any kind for orexin or for hypocretin. This is a never-filed status rather than a withdrawal or a refusal.
Three approved insomnia drugs act at these receptors in the opposite direction. Suvorexant (NDA204569), lemborexant (NDA212028) and daridorexant (NDA214985) are orexin receptor antagonists. They block the receptors orexin-B activates, so their trial data are evidence about antagonism. Almorexant, a fourth orexin receptor antagonist, reached phase 3 in chronic insomnia, holds no United States approval of any kind, and its development was discontinued.
The agonist direction now has a human record, and it belongs to small molecules rather than to the peptide. TAK-994, an oral OX2R agonist, had its phase 2 narcolepsy trial and extension stopped early for hepatic adverse events, leaving primary endpoint data for 41 of 73 randomized patients [18]. A different molecule from the same sponsor went further. Oveporexton, the international nonproprietary name for TAK-861, holds a live FDA approval under NDA220860 for narcolepsy type 1 [19]. Danavorexton, another OX2R agonist, has completed randomized phase 1 work in healthy men [20]. The danavorexton trial reported more treatment-emergent adverse events on drug than on placebo, all rated mild, and one drug-related case of insomnia [20]. These are small molecules of different chemistry, and none of their results is orexin-B evidence in either direction. Other companies have OX2R agonist programs in ongoing trials, and none of those molecules is the peptide either.
Commercial interests run through the agonist literature: Takeda sponsored the TAK-994 trial and develops oveporexton and danavorexton [18][19][20]. The engineered OX2R-selective analogue came from Banyu Pharmaceutical, then the Japanese affiliate of Merck & Co [3]. The affinity figures most often copied into product descriptions reach PubChem through a commercial peptide supplier's depositor comment. The primary source for those figures is Sakurai 1998 [1].
The orexin-B record is short. It is an OX2R-preferring full agonist at both orexin receptors, and it does not reach the brain intact from the bloodstream in mice. Four side-by-side studies returned a signal for orexin-A and none for orexin-B. Its positive findings sit in cell culture and in animals. Among positive orexin-B results in animals with a stated route, all but one used delivery directly into the brain. Two groups agree on the direction in rodent MPTP models, and neither report has been repeated in a third laboratory. One 1999 pig study reported a feeding effect by a peripheral route, and it stands alone [6]. Orexin-B has never been administered to a human being in a registered study.
Has orexin-B ever been given to people? No person has received orexin-B in a registered trial, on a live ClinicalTrials.gov check dated 2026-08-28. There is no human pharmacokinetic, safety or dose-finding data for this peptide. The human study cited here separating the two peptides was observational, and it measured plasma concentrations rather than testing administration [10].
Is orexin-B OX2R-selective? The primary data support a preference rather than selectivity. The quoted affinities are roughly 36 nM at OX2R against roughly 420 nM at OX1R, roughly a ten to twelve-fold preference, traced to Sakurai 1998 [1]. The IUPHAR Guide to Pharmacology lists orexin-B as a full agonist at both receptors. The genuinely OX2R-selective peptides are engineered analogues, not orexin-B [3][4].
Do the approved orexin drugs tell you anything about orexin-B? Suvorexant, lemborexant and daridorexant are orexin receptor antagonists approved for insomnia, and they block the receptors orexin-B activates. Their trial data are evidence about antagonism. An OX2R agonist is now approved for narcolepsy type 1, oveporexton under NDA220860, but it is a small molecule and not the peptide [19].
Are orexin-A findings transferable to orexin-B? Four side-by-side studies returned a signal for orexin-A and none for orexin-B. Those were brain entry from blood in mice [5], arousal in neonatal chicks [8], adipocyte metabolism in pigs [9], and plasma concentrations in human obesity [10]. The human one was observational, and it measured plasma concentrations rather than testing administration [10]. In rat midbrain culture orexin-B protected dopamine neurons where orexin-A had only marginal effects [11].
Available for research
Lab-tested, batch-specific COA published, ships from US stock.
Chemistry & Handling
Molecular identity, reconstitution, storage, stability, and purity verification.
Safety Data Sheet
16-section GHS format · hazard identification, handling, storage and disposal
References
A spadin-derived peptide designed to block TREK-1, PE-22-28 has three preclinical papers, no independent replication and no trial on ClinicalTrials.gov.
P021 research is sixteen years of animal and cell studies with no independent replication. No human trial has ever run. What the evidence shows and omits.
Orexin-A is mostly measured, not given: four small human intranasal studies, wakefulness nulls, and approved insomnia drugs that block its receptors.
No study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov has ever given humanin to human participants. What the cell, animal and biomarker research actually reports.
DSIP research: what controlled human sleep trials found, why independent groups did not replicate the sleep effect, and FDA reviewers' 2026 call.
DNSP-11 is an 11-mer from the pro-GDNF proregion. No published human study of it exists. Every dopaminergic finding comes from one patent-holding lab.