VIP Research
An evidence-led review of VIP and aviptadil research: regulatory status stated precisely, the COVID-19 and ARDS trials, and the erectile dysfunction evidence.
SS-31 is a synthetic tetrapeptide, and elamipretide, MTP-131 and Bendavia are three further names for the same molecule [21][25]. PubChem resolves each name, and the CAS number 736992-21-5, to the same record, CID 11764719 [21]. The sequence is D-Arg-Dmt-Lys-Phe-NH2, where Dmt is 2,6-dimethyltyrosine, and every residue is L except arginine, which is D [1][21].
The formula is C32H49N9O5 and the free base molecular weight is 639.8 [21]. The approved pharmaceutical product is a different form, the trihydrochloride salt, whose molecular weight is 749.2 [1][21]. Listings often print 749.2 as the peptide's own molecular weight, but that figure belongs to the salt.
The usual statement that a compound is not approved for human therapeutic use is not accurate for this molecule.
The molecule holds a United States approval granted on 19 September 2025, and that approval is accelerated rather than full [1][2][3]. It covers one rare inherited mitochondrial disorder, Barth syndrome, in patients weighing at least 30 kg [1]. It rests on an intermediate endpoint, knee extensor muscle strength, not on a demonstrated clinical outcome [1]. The label states that continued approval may be contingent on verification of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial [1]. That confirmatory trial began recruiting in July 2026, with primary completion estimated for 2029 [22].
The approval attaches to a regulated prescription product and to that one disease. It does not extend to research-grade material, to any other condition, or to any other compound.
European status is a designation, not an approval. Elamipretide holds an EU orphan designation for Barth syndrome, EU/3/21/2430, designated on 20 May 2021 [26]. The register states that orphan designation does not mean a medicine is authorized for use [26].
(human) The approval rests on TAZPOWER, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in 12 patients [4]. The authors state that in part 1 neither primary endpoint was met, and improvements on both measures appeared only in part 2, the uncontrolled open-label extension [4]. The label records that the drug was not superior to placebo on those primary endpoints [1].
(human) A 168-week open-label extension reported a cumulative 96.1 m gain on the six-minute walk test against extension baseline [5]. There was no placebo group, and 8 of 10 entrants reached that timepoint [5]. (human) A retrospective study compared 8 treated patients with 19 untreated historical controls [6]. It reported a 79.7 m walk difference and a 40.8 N strength difference by handheld dynamometry at week 64 [6]. Propensity matching cannot correct for unmeasured confounding.
(human) MMPOWER-3 was a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 218 adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy [7]. It missed both co-primary endpoints at 24 weeks, and the six-minute walk difference of -3.2 m (95% CI -18.7 to 12.3; p=0.69) numerically favored placebo [7]. The fatigue score difference was -0.07 (95% CI -0.10 to 0.26; p=0.37) [7]. The authors report Class I evidence that elamipretide does not improve those endpoints [7]. The registry lists the trial as terminated, with the sponsor citing the missed primary endpoints [7]. The open-label extension of MMPOWER-2 was terminated for the same stated reason [7].
(human) The two earlier steps also missed: MMPOWER, in 36 adults, returned p=0.053 on its unadjusted primary comparison [10]. (human) MMPOWER-2, in 30 patients, returned a 19.8 m difference (95% CI -2.8 to 42.5; p=0.0833) [9]. (human) A post hoc genotype subgroup of the failed phase 3 reported a trend in one nuclear-DNA group [8]. Post hoc subgroups of null trials are hypothesis-generating only, as that paper states [8]. (human) NuPOWER, the 102-patient trial built to test that hypothesis, completed in December 2024 [23]. No results were posted and no publication was located as of 28 August 2026, which is an absence of evidence, not a reported failure [23].
(human) PROGRESS-HF, in 71 patients with reduced ejection fraction, found no effect on left ventricular end-systolic volume (p=0.90 and p=0.28) [11]. (human) An earlier phase 1 single-infusion study in 36 patients reported volume reductions in the highest-exposure cohort only, which the adequately powered trial then failed to confirm [11][12]. (human) EMBRACE STEMI was negative on its primary endpoint and on every prespecified secondary [13]. (human) ReCLAIM-2, in 176 patients with dry age-related macular degeneration, missed both primary endpoints [14].
The approval is for a single-gene cardiolipin remodeling defect, and it is not evidence that acting on mitochondria produces clinical benefit. This molecule failed in every other mitochondrial indication tested [7][9][10][11][13][14].
(in vitro, animal) SS-31 binds cardiolipin at the inner mitochondrial membrane and inhibits the cytochrome c peroxidase reaction that drives cardiolipin peroxidation [16]. In rats it protected cristae during renal ischemia and accelerated ATP recovery on reperfusion [16]. (in vitro) Biophysical work shows it partitions into the membrane interfacial region and modulates surface electrostatics, so it is not a conventional free-radical scavenger [17]. (in vitro, animal) A genome-scale CRISPR screen identified PLSCR3 as essential for its protective effect, and knockout abrogated that effect in mice [18]. The molecular target is still being revised.
(animal) In 14 dogs with induced heart failure, elamipretide improved ejection fraction and mitochondrial respiration measures [19]. That result did not transfer to people, and PROGRESS-HF was null [11][19]. The mechanistic review cited here was written by the peptide's inventor, who founded the developing company [20].
(human) Label pharmacokinetics describe roughly 92% absolute subcutaneous bioavailability and low plasma protein binding [1]. Metabolism proceeds by sequential C-terminal degradation to inactive fragments, and urinary recovery is essentially complete within 48 hours in patients with normal renal function [1]. Elimination is renal, and exposure rises substantially in renal impairment [1]. The label states no terminal half-life, so none should be quoted.
(human) A randomized trial found that a single infusion marginally raised skeletal muscle ATPmax immediately afterward, an effect of borderline significance (p=0.055 and p=0.045 on the two tests) [15]. There was no difference by day 7 and no change in fatigue resistance [15].
(human) In the controlled crossover, local administration reactions occurred in all 12 patients on drug and in 8 of 12 on placebo [1]. The label carries hypersensitivity warnings and a benzyl alcohol contraindication in neonates [1]. Near-universal injection-site reactions also make genuine blinding doubtful in small crossover trials [1]. Stealth BioTherapeutics sponsored essentially the entire clinical program described here [1][4][5][7].
Aging, athletic performance and general mitochondrial support in healthy people have not been tested in controlled trials. A 2026 sports medicine review covering SS-31 and similar grey-market peptides concludes that rigorous human safety data are scarce, and there is potential for serious harm to patients [24]. Research-grade material is not a medicine and is not for human consumption.
Is SS-31 the same molecule as elamipretide? Yes. SS-31, elamipretide, MTP-131 and Bendavia are four names for one molecule [21][25]. PubChem resolves each of those names to the same record, CID 11764719 [21].
SS-31 is described as FDA approved. What does that approval actually cover? It is an accelerated United States approval granted on 19 September 2025 [1][2][3]. It covers Barth syndrome only, in patients weighing at least 30 kg [1]. It was granted on an intermediate endpoint, knee extensor muscle strength, and continued approval may be contingent on a confirmatory trial that is not expected to complete before 2029 [1][22]. The pivotal program comprised 12 patients, and the randomized part of that trial met neither primary endpoint [1][4].
What did the largest human trial of SS-31 find? MMPOWER-3 randomized 218 adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy and missed both co-primary endpoints at 24 weeks [7]. The six-minute walk difference was -3.2 m (p=0.69) and the fatigue difference was -0.07 (p=0.37) [7]. The authors report Class I evidence that elamipretide does not improve those endpoints, and the trial was terminated for that reason [7].
Which molecular weight is correct for SS-31? The free base molecular weight is 639.8, for the formula C32H49N9O5 [21]. The figure 749.2 is the molecular weight of the trihydrochloride salt used in the approved pharmaceutical product, so it should not be printed as the peptide's own weight [1][21].
SS-31 (Elamipretide) is available as a research compound, HPLC-verified with a batch-specific COA.
Certificate of Analysis
Batch PP/SS3/062026 · 99.361% purity by HPLC · certified Jul 2026
References
An evidence-led review of VIP and aviptadil research: regulatory status stated precisely, the COVID-19 and ARDS trials, and the erectile dysfunction evidence.
An evidence-led review of PNC-27 research: the human record, FDA findings on material sold to patients, the proposed mechanism, and the cell and animal work.
An evidence-led review of oxytocin research: regulatory status, the delivery question, the autism trials, and the trust and social cognition literature.
An evidence-led review of kisspeptin-10 research: its mechanism, the human studies, why the evidence in women is inconsistent, and what it does not show.
An evidence-led review of FOXO4-DRI research: the proposed mechanism, the preclinical findings, the negative and null results, and the human record.
An evidence-led review of ADAMAX: what the published literature contains, the nearest relevant chemistry, and where the seller rationale comes from.