Thymosin Beta-4 Research
Thymosin beta-4 (timbetasin) is the 43-residue parent of TB-500, not the same molecule. Review of its Phase 3 record, nulls and conflicts.
Shop by category
Growth Hormone Axis ResearchRegeneration ResearchPeptide BioregulatorsCognitive & Neuropeptide ResearchMetabolic & Cellular ResearchMelanocortin & Endocrine ResearchDermal Peptide ResearchImmune & Thymic ResearchB7-33 research is entirely preclinical, and every experimental B7-33 result below comes from in vitro work or from rats and mice [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][11][12]. No published study has given B7-33 to a human [16]. Serelaxin is a different substance, the parent hormone made as a drug, and the large human trial record belongs to it rather than to B7-33 [13][14].
B7-33 is a synthetic 27-residue single-chain peptide derived from human gene-2 relaxin [1]. It covers residues 7 to 29 of the relaxin B chain, with both cysteines replaced by serine and four residues, KRSL, added at the C-terminus [1]. It has no A chain and no disulfide bond, so it is neither relaxin nor serelaxin [1]. The design steps described in the founding paper are physical rather than pharmacological [1]. Solution NMR, an in vitro method, then showed that the peptide is largely unstructured [1].
The declared CAS number 1818415-56-3 resolves to PubChem CID 162662592, which returns the formula C131H229N41O36S and a mass of 2,986.5 g/mol [17]. That formula holds one sulfur atom, which matches the one methionine in the B7 to B29 sequence and no cysteine [1][17]. The absence of cysteine is consistent with the two serine substitutions, although a sulfur count alone cannot identify serine [1][17]. One caveat attaches to the identifier. Its only PubChem substance record was deposited by a peptide supplier rather than by a registry [17].
The B7 immune co-stimulatory proteins, including CD80, CD86 and B7-H3, are unrelated to this peptide [16]. A substance-registry search for the name B7-33 returns antibody-drug conjugates directed at those targets instead [16].
B7-33 binds relaxin family peptide receptor 1, or RXFP1, and preferentially drives ERK1/2 phosphorylation over cAMP in vitro, in cells that natively express the receptor [1]. That preference was measured after the peptide was made, rather than designed into it [1]. B7-33 is a full cAMP agonist of weak potency, not a peptide that avoids the cAMP arm [1]. Deliberate design for low cAMP potency begins with the same group's later analog work [11].
In HEK-293T cells expressing human RXFP1, B7-33 gave a pKi of 5.54 against 8.96 for relaxin, roughly 2,600-fold weaker binding in vitro [1]. cAMP potency in those cells was pEC50 5.12 against 10.49, roughly 230,000-fold weaker [1]. Weak cAMP potency also appeared in THP1 cells, which express RXFP1 natively [1]. The claim that B7-33 matches relaxin is an ERK1/2 result in fibroblasts, and it does not extend to binding or to cAMP [1]. The originating group's later paper repeats the weakness, reporting that low binding affinity made comparison of B7-33 analogs difficult [11]. That group had to build an engineered receptor ectodomain construct to obtain a measurable B7-33 binding curve in vitro [11].
Free B7-33 has an in vitro serum half-life of about six minutes [12]. Fatty-acid conjugation raised that to about sixty minutes, and the longer half-life belongs to the lipidated analog [12].
In a mouse ischemia-reperfusion model, B7-33 reduced infarct size to 21.99% against 45.32% for vehicle and preserved fractional shortening at 29% against 23%, both at P=0.02 [3]. That study was co-authored with the originating Melbourne group [3]. In mouse isoprenaline-induced cardiomyopathy, B7-33 and relaxin equivalently reduced left ventricular fibrosis, inflammation and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and B7-33 reduced fibrosis where perindopril did not [4].
In rats, an equimolar intravenous injection of B7-33 or serelaxin enhanced bradykinin-mediated endothelium-dependent relaxation in the mesenteric artery [2]. Neither had any overall effect in the small renal artery or the abdominal aorta [2]. That vascular result is vessel-bed-selective [2].
The same paper also ran an ex vivo arm using mouse mesenteric arteries [2]. Those arteries were pre-incubated in placental trophoblast conditioned media, which induces the endothelial dysfunction characteristic of preeclampsia [2]. Co-incubation with B7-33 or serelaxin prevented that dysfunction from developing [2]. That result is isolated artery tissue, not a preeclampsia model in a living animal [2].
In a mouse model of renal fibrosis, relaxin, B7-33 and perindopril all reduced collagen fiber thickness and cross-reticulation, while increasing collagen fiber counts [5]. That paper validates an imaging platform, and B7-33 is a tool compound within it [5].
In mice with inflammatory paw pain, B7-33 injected into the cerebral ventricles reduced mechanical and thermal sensitivity at 30 minutes and not thereafter [6]. An RXFP1 antagonist blocked the mechanical component but not the thermal one [6]. That route carries no information about B7-33 reaching the brain from the bloodstream.
Three further animal results belong to formulations rather than to the peptide alone. A coating releasing B7-33 locally cut fibrotic capsule thickness around implants in mice by 49.2% over six weeks [7]. Iron-oxide nanoparticle conjugates stayed anti-fibrotic when given orally to mice, and the oral route belongs to the nanoparticle [8]. B7-33-carrying nanovesicles inhibited tumor growth by 67.7% in a mouse cholangiocarcinoma xenograft (p<0.001), as one part of a combination construct [9].
There is no published or registered human research on B7-33 [16]. ClinicalTrials.gov returns zero studies for the term, and the EU Clinical Trials Register returns no matching protocol [16]. PubMed returns 15 records for the term B7-33, of which 12 concern this peptide and none involve human subjects [16]. openFDA returns no label and no approval record for B7-33 [16]. No US or EU regulatory record for the peptide appears in the registries searched for this article [16].
Serelaxin is recombinant human relaxin-2, the parent hormone manufactured as a drug [13]. In RELAX-AHF-2, 6,545 patients hospitalized for acute heart failure received serelaxin or placebo [13]. Cardiovascular death at 180 days occurred in 8.7% against 8.9% (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.15, P=0.77) [13]. Worsening heart failure at day 5 occurred in 6.9% against 7.7% (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.07, P=0.19) [13]. Both co-primary endpoints were missed [13]. Death from any cause at 180 days also showed no significant difference between the groups [13]. Nor did the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure or renal rehospitalization at 180 days [13]. The length of the index hospital stay did not differ either [13]. Novartis Pharma funded the trial [13].
A later fixed-effect meta-analysis of six serelaxin trials reported less 5-day worsening heart failure, 6.0% against 8.1% (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.89, P=0.0002) [14]. It also reported that serelaxin was associated with lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98, P=0.0261) [14]. That mortality estimate is borderline, because its confidence interval reaches 0.98 [14]. It is a pooled secondary endpoint [14]. The analysis found no significant effect on length of stay, cardiovascular death or rehospitalization [14]. Four further qualifiers attach to the meta-analysis. It appeared after the confirmatory trial had already missed, and the serelaxin program's own investigators led it [14]. The pooled trials were coordinated by a single sponsor, Corthera, which is a wholly owned Novartis subsidiary [14]. Several of its authors disclose Novartis grants and personal fees during the conduct of the study [14].
Marketing authorization for serelaxin under the name Reasanz was refused in the European Union [18]. The European Medicines Agency's CHMP adopted a negative opinion on 23 January 2014 and confirmed the refusal on re-examination on 22 May 2014 [18]. The European Commission issued the refusal decision, which closes the file, on 5 August 2014 [18]. That was a refusal by the regulator, not a withdrawal by the applicant [18]. openFDA holds no serelaxin approval or label record [16].
Neither half of that record transfers to B7-33. Serelaxin's earlier positive signals are not evidence for B7-33, because no human has been given B7-33 in a published study [16]. Serelaxin's failure is not evidence against B7-33, because the two molecules differ in structure and in receptor pharmacology [1][13]. The founding B7-33 paper's abstract separately states that relaxin gained provisional FDA approval for acute heart failure [1]. Neither that approval nor that regulatory category exists [16].
Eleven of the 12 B7-33 papers indexed in PubMed carry an author from the Florey Institute, the University of Melbourne or Monash University [16]. The twelfth is a Chinese nanomedicine study in which B7-33 is one part of a construct [9]. No clean independent replication of B7-33 on its own has been published [16]. That is a replication gap rather than a failed replication, because few groups outside the network have tried.
US patent 10,081,662 B2, covering modified relaxin B chain peptides and naming B7-33, was granted in September 2018 to the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health [19]. Its named inventors include authors of the founding paper [19]. That paper carries no conflict-of-interest declaration and does not mention the patent [1]. Australian public grants funded it rather than industry, which counts in its favor [1].
Sanofi's published relaxin-mimetic work developed a lipidated single-chain analog rather than B7-33 itself, and that successor's subcutaneous bioavailability and extended half-life belong to it [15]. The originating group records that those Sanofi analogs regained cAMP potency similar to relaxin's, so the successor gave up the signaling preference that distinguishes B7-33 [11]. Short single-chain peptides from the H1 relaxin isoform showed no meaningful RXFP1 affinity and no relaxin-like activity in vitro, while serelaxin worked in the same assays [10]. Those H1 peptides are not B7-33, and that paper does not test B7-33 [10]. Their failure is a caution that short relaxin B-chain peptides are not a reliably active class [10]. The cytotrophoblast line of B7-33 preeclampsia work has no peer-reviewed paper behind it, and exists only as conference abstracts [16]. The only indexed peer-reviewed preeclampsia-related B7-33 result is an ex vivo mouse artery arm in the 2017 vascular study [2][16]. No B7-33 preeclampsia study in a living animal or in a human has been published [16].
B7-33 remains a preclinical tool compound roughly ten years after it was first described [1]. Its receptor binding in vitro is about 2,600-fold weaker than relaxin's, and its free serum half-life in vitro is about six minutes [1][12]. Its evidence base is animal and in vitro, and the group holding the patent produced most of it [16][19]. No human has received B7-33 in a published study [16].
No published study has given B7-33 to a human. ClinicalTrials.gov returns zero studies for the term, and the EU Clinical Trials Register returns no matching protocol. Every published experimental B7-33 result comes from in vitro work or from rodents.
It does not transfer in either direction. Serelaxin is recombinant relaxin-2, while B7-33 is a fragment-derived analog with different receptor pharmacology. Serelaxin's confirmatory trial missed both co-primary endpoints, and that result is about serelaxin. No human has been given B7-33 in a published study, so serelaxin's earlier signals are not evidence for it either. ---
References
Thymosin beta-4 (timbetasin) is the 43-residue parent of TB-500, not the same molecule. Review of its Phase 3 record, nulls and conflicts.
LL-37 is an endogenous human peptide, and only four human studies have administered it. Its largest placebo-controlled trial missed its primary endpoint.
KPV has never been administered to a human in a published study. A review of its preclinical evidence, its unsettled mechanism and FDA's position.
ARA-290 (cibinetide) reached phase 2 in humans. An evidence-led review of what its trials found, what they missed, and where development now stands.
BPC-157, TB-500 and GHK-Cu in preclinical tissue repair research — angiogenesis, migration and matrix findings, evidence tiered. For research use only.
An evidence-led look at TB-500 research into Thymosin Beta-4 biology, covering the actin-binding domain, proposed mechanisms in cell migration and angiogenesis, and preclinical dermal and cardiac repair studies.